Email This Post Email This Post

Yet Another “Surge” Article – Wall Street Journal

“Ova Time: Women Line Up To Donate Eggs – For Money”

Melinda Beck’s piece in today’s Wall Street Journal was overall accurate. It even acknowledged the cost for the recipient side.

It also acknowledges the ASRM’s limit on compensation and mentions one donor agency that ignores it, since “the offer brings in donors who might not otherwise be interested.” But that is just the point of the limit; a compensation of $50,000 can be unduly coercive. Furthermore, since any legitimate clinic is a member of the ASRM and therefore pledges to abide by its guidelines, what clinic would agree to work with these donors? These exorbitant fees depend on ethical breaches by more than just the agency, but the doctor as well.

The ASRM’s compensation limit was set in 2000, and reiterated in 2007 but not updated. I think the changing times require an update to $12,000 or more. But until it is official, in our egg donation program we will keep our compensation at $10,000. It is worth it to keep our ethical standards.

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

Related posts:

  1. The latest on Egg Donor Compensation
    Yet another reaction to the Hastings Center report, this time in the New York Times (”Payment Offers to Egg Donors Prompt Scrutiny“). Here’s the shocker: people are willing to pay more for highly desirable egg...


  2. Barnard College Holds Panel on Egg Donation
    If Barnard College’s student journalism is as poorly researched as their recent panel discussion about egg donation, these gals don’t really understand egg donation. Some actual egg donors might have injected some reality into the...


Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.